Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Truth’

A State of Cyber War Exists

December 8, 2010 1 comment

WikiLeaks supporters in the hacking community are fighting back. They’re now trying to cripple the websites of companies that have chosen not to assist in what some are calling an internet grassroots rebellion and others call anarchy. Whatever you call it, the World Wide Web has now become a battleground.

The phrase, “one man’s freedom-fighter is another man’s terrorist,” has never been more apt. Using the technology of the modern age of communications, Julian Assange has revolutionized the impact of the internet, using its reach and its many hiding places to wage guerilla combat against the governments of the world. The attempts to stop the WikiLeaks movement have been almost laughable as governments and others- the establishment, if you will- try to figure out how to stop these folks from doing deadly damage.

Particularly alarming to U.S. authorities this week was the leak of a State Department cable that listed sites around the world whose loss could “critically impact” the communications, economy and security of the United States. We are now beyond guessing motives and looking for journalistic logic to explain the content of these leaks. With this particular release, it’s tempting to conclude that we are in a state of cyber-war and the rebellion just might actually mean to cause us real harm.

The list WikiLeaks published includes our bridges, mines and dams; critical underwater communication cables and oil pipelines; specific factories that make vaccines and weapons parts. The State Department calls it an Al Qaeda targeting list.

And so the establishment is trying to fight back. Somebody- we don’t who- has waged sophisticated denial-of-service attacks on WikiLeaks web sites. Governments have succeeded in getting many companies whose servers were being used by WikiLeaks, to kick them off their platforms. Credit card companies and PayPal are now refusing to process donations to the rebellion. Assange himself sits in a British prison as Swedish authorities seek his extradition on what may or may not be legitimate charges of rape against two women, allegedly committed last August.

And now the rebellion is responding. From this morning’s Washington Post:

LONDON — WikiLeaks supporters struck back Wednesday at perceived enemies of founder Julian Assange, attacking the websites of Swedish prosecutors, the Swedish lawyer whose clients have accused Assange of sexual crimes and the Swiss authority that froze Assange’s bank account.

MasterCard, which pulled the plug on its relationship with WikiLeaks on Tuesday, also seemed to be having severe technological problems.

The online vengeance campaign appeared to be taking the form of denial of service attacks in which computers across the Internet are harnessed – sometimes surreptitiously – to jam target sites with mountains of requests for data, knocking them out of commission.

The online attacks are part of a wave of online support for WikiLeaks that is sweeping the Internet. Twitter was choked with messages of solidarity Wednesday, while the site’s Facebook page hit 1 million fans.

The establishment’s attempts to silence WikiLeaks have, so far, been ineffective. There are literally hundreds and hundreds of mirror web sites that have sprouted across the globe that are keeping the site up. The list of these web sites is easy to find and WikiLeaks is not hard to get to on your office or home computer.

Where all this ends is anyone’s guess. This really does seem to be right out of some edgy science-fiction book. A novelist, I think, could surmise how this story will unfold as well as any security expert or CIA analysis team.

Ultimately, one would think human nature will run its course. Heady with excitement with their cause and their impact, and now counter-attacking against the establishment with cyber warfare- how far will the rebellion go? Will they start taking down web sites of bloggers who disagree with Assange? Why not? They have no qualms attacking the web sites of companies who have every right to conduct business with whomever they want.

One thing becoming clearer in my mind, is that when WikiLeaks releases documents revealing America’s security soft-spots and Assange’s supporters start taking down the web sites of those who they perceive as disagreeing with them- this movement seems to become increasingly less about free expression and more about creating chaos in the name of truth.

Baseball’s Lies

Associated Press- Paul Sanoya


I always thought Bud Selig was the single worst Commissioner in the history of Baseball and now it’s official. His stubborn refusal to entertain the expansion of instant replay in the sport is now making Baseball look extremely foolish.

By now, you have probably heard about the blown call by first base umpire Jim Joyce last night that cost Detroit Tiger pitcher Armando Galarraga a place in baseball history. It just can’t get worst than this for an umpire or for the game; to blow a call on the 27th out that would have given the young man a perfect game…and Baseball, its first season ever with three perfect gems.

Jim Joyce is not to blame. He is an experienced 21-year umpiring veteran and one of the best in the business. He blew it because he’s human. A more heart-rending mea culpa will never be heard. He apologized directly to Galarraga following the game after he’d seen the replay. There was a hug involved. He cried in an interview saying he felt so bad that he had deprived the kid of a perfect game.

Even Detroit Manager, Jim Leyland, after going nuts on the field after the contest, seemed to undergo a change of heart later when he said Joyce was a good ump who just missed a call.

So why isn’t there instant replay in baseball other than for home run calls? There’s always been the “purist” argument; that the game’s events have always been decided by the umps and that humanity and it’s occasional failings are just part of the sport. Rather quaint, I’d say.

The real reason for limited instant replay is the insane concern the sport has had for years about the length of its games; that instant replay would just drag things out too long. I’ve never understood why there’s a problem with long baseball games. Baseball’s powers-that-be seem to be perpetually paranoid that their sport isn’t fast or exciting enough. Which shows how fundamentally they misunderstand their own sport.

Baseball is what it is. Sometime it’s fast, sometimes it’s as lethargic as a slow, humid summer day. That’s part of the charm. It’s three hours of mostly slow, strategic ritual interspersed with exhilerating moments of breathtaking action.

Baseball should be willing to wait a few minutes while the umps take a look at a controversial call on a replay. Everyone, except the record books and the box scores, knows Armando Galarraga threw a perfect game last night. You cannot deny the truth you see with your own eyes.

Leave it to Bud Selig and his crony owners to cripple the sport into making it accept a lie as reality; that Cleveland’s Jason Donald was safe at first base on the evening of June 2nd, 2010 and that a 28-year old Venezuelan pitcher for the Detroit Tigers did not achieve perfection.

Note: Baseball Commissioner, Bud Selig, this afternoon announced Major League Baseball would look at expanded instant replay. here is the Commissioner’s complete statement:

“First, on behalf of Major League Baseball, I congratulate Armando Galarraga on a remarkable pitching performance. All of us who love the game appreciate the historic nature of his effort last night.

“The dignity and class of the entire Detroit Tigers organization under such circumstances were truly admirable and embodied good sportsmanship of the highest order. Armando and Detroit manager Jim Leyland are to be commended for their handling of a very difficult situation. I also applaud the courage of umpire Jim Joyce to address this unfortunate situation honestly and directly. Jim’s candor illustrates why he has earned the respect of on-field personnel throughout his accomplished career in the Major Leagues since 1989.

“As Jim Joyce said in his postgame comments, there is no dispute that last night’s game should have ended differently. While the human element has always been an integral part of baseball, it is vital that mistakes on the field be addressed. Given last night’s call and other recent events, I will examine our umpiring system, the expanded use of instant replay and all other related features. Before I announce any decisions, I will consult with all appropriate parties, including our two unions and the Special Committee for On-Field Matters, which consists of field managers, general managers, club owners and presidents.”